Editorial #2 - August 15 2002 - Is Pride and Prejudice stealing
Increasing support suggests now as a good time for action review.
Let's use the Stock Market for example. The market is behaving very
erratically and on a down trend. The pundits are saying things like,
"If you haven't sold don't worry too much so long as you are
in for the long haul. Good stocks will always come good, there has
never been a ten year period when prices have not advanced; now
is the time to look for good buying opportunities."
Now the birds sitting in a 1,000 year old tree might give each
other similar advice but, when rot is in the heartwood and the most
severe storm in memory is brewing; or when the axe-man stands at
the base and says, "I can get a few homes out of this one"
then all past history of the tree is irrelevant.
Stock-market waves come and go irrespective of the tide coming
in or going out but the usurious commercial system is rotten to
the core and it seems likely that there is an axe-man standing by
saying this tree is in the path of human progress. Intelligence
must tell us that this tree is going to fall. It is a big tree,
it may take some time to fall, but its days are numbered and its
fall will be hard. This is not a time for nesting in the branches.
We are advised to take note of both old and the new knowledge.
Old knowledge shows us that things not only resist change but that
they also end. We need old history to know ourselves and we need
new history to see that reaching the future requires change in our
lives and attitudes. A problem of community is that we get stuck
in a groove of pride and prejudice and become afraid to admit of
need to change.
How Pride and Prejudice blind us!
Never forget that intelligence does not always mean wisdom! While
the very wise need also be very intelligent the very intelligent
can also be very unwise. Those not so gifted with intelligence may,
within the limits of their intelligence, exhibit more wisdom than
those of greater intelligence, mindwarp of pride and prejudice cause
the downfall of many intelligent people.
Day after day, year after year, with monotonous repetition, professors
write enlightening articles, mobs rampage, individuals complain.
All know the facts, or enough of the facts to state their case,
but fail to reach crucial conclusions. WHY?
Over time many letters are written to such people, or their advocates,
but experience shows it wasted time, few admit that the knowledge
they display may not match critical conclusions they reach.
It is unlikely the people involved are moles knowingly working
for the enemy. They take their stand with genuine concern. They
know the situation but refuse to draw the rational conclusion; ingrained
convictions stop the flow of rational thought. Even when cultural
brainwashing is explained, as in Globalism-Brainwash,
or natural loyalty forces are explained as they are in The
Stockholm Syndrome, few will face their disability. Dedicated
mind-sets can be so rigid as to need forceful techniques to move.
An article read long ago gave a typical example. A researcher,
having uncovered a phenomenon not accepted by contemporary science,
presented the evidence to a group of fellow scientists under conditions
of their own choice so that they knew that no trickery was involved.
All admitted the result proved the point however on the following
day all denied it.
To help truth lovers advance it is important we look into this
'can of worms'. Here are two examples of letters commenting on literature
in attempt to break mindsets by logical explanation. These matters
are crucial to those who want to live in truth.
Your literature shows the strength of your
arguments, others argue to the same conclusions even if in a different
terms. Excuse me if I misread you but I think its time for straight
talking, the problems we have to solve are not going to be solved
by bending with the breeze.
You are well aware that the human world is
heading for catastrophe but, within my reading of your position,
you do not appear to address the basic problem. Yes you see that
globalism is behind the market philosophy but do not admit that
the globalist philosophy is deliberately created for a designed
goal. Can we really believe that the huge globalist (World Government)
enterprise is merely for money or that Globalists are too stupid
to understand the consequences of what they are doing? Can we believe,
against all evidence of history that the very ambitious care about
Do we not have to admit that although these
families are motivated by greed they are, at the same time, not
entirely stupid? Globalists, as you know, already have unlimited
access to money and, although wisdom may not be their strength they
do have access to top brains for help with planning and social research.
They plan thoroughly if not wisely.
Our failure is that we ignore the importance
of the philosophy directing our culture. This failure is so basic
as to be difficult to explain. Nevertheless we must try.
It is evident that many people cannot face
challenge to their ingrained beliefs. The thought is so traumatic
that, to avoid confrontation between truth and pride, they misread
or ignore evidence. However socially alert people can see that it
is 'the philosophy of an intelligent culture that shapes the culture'.
Our philosophy of life creates our way of life just as surely as
the kind of germ we catch decides the kind of illness we develop.
So all mob protests, all reasoning complaints
and academic articles, backed by all the activists with all their
good-will for creating a better culture, will always fail while
the culture is governed by a belief system which, under the microscope
of intelligence, tells us that life is without meaning or purpose.
When we believe that life is a meaningless act of fate - that there
is no truth, no right or wrong, no good or evil, then intelligent
culture is set to self-destruct. This is because, removed from the
rational intellectual base of its foundation, thinking becomes erratic,
confused and self-contradicting. Those swayed by appeals to kindness
can present no convincing intellectual argument to stem the tide
of violence and frustration that results from intellectual despair.
A philosophy based on belief (even though
that belief be false) will always direct culture. Emotion based
morality does not direct culture. Today we live in a culture governed
by a false philosophy and, to disguise its true nature, this philosophy
is coupled with emotion-based 'feel-good' morality. Most people
accept the feel-good morality because they then do not have to face
the trauma of a plainly inhuman philosophy. This is only possible
because we are brainwashed to defend ingrained attitudes.
In this event the young, as is their nature,
seek a life that is meaningful within the philosophy they are taught
is based on truth. However without meaningful values the only meaning
life then has is based on selfishness, personal pleasure and excitement
which they accept as their moral right because their morality is
- There are three elements of brainwashing
involved: the first is to install conviction to a philosophy based
on a false creation belief; the second is to add a feel-good morality
based on emotion; the third is to promote an ego defence for pride
and prejudice to deter us (victims) making an intelligent assessment
showing our philosophy and our morality are incompatible.
So there it is; you know the kind of world
we live in, you know where it is heading. Will you take up the challenge
of philosophy and help reveal the truth of life and a morality based
on truth. This is the only force able to power rational reform.
First let me congratulate you, so much
good material. However I write in challenge to your correspondent
This great writer offers good sense, good
expression and a strong grip of the true nature of world government.
However there is a blind spot. While this involves a small part
of the writing, it undermines its value as enlightening, exposing,
literature. Example: quote: " Humanity is being driven by fanatic
fundamentalists to create money for those who already have it without
limit - no obstruction is permitted."
Now all who study the problem, including
your correspondent, know that Globalism can 'acquire' whatever money
it wants, it already owns or controls most big business. So why
plan and scheme and go through the trauma of enslaving the world
for meaningless gain? How can we imagine that those who own and
control the worldwide financial system and can, if they don't want
to create inflation, make billions just as easily as saying, "the
banks are going to sell gold"? Or by spreading rumours and
dumping stock to create a market crash, buying back at a lower level
and selling again on the confidence rebound.
How can we fail to see, if only from the
horrendous nature of their planning, that they are not that stupid.
How can we fail to see that, in their situation, there is no point
to making money that they don't need! Can intelligent people be
so foolish as to devote life and family future to worthless ledger
Let us put ourselves in their place for
a minute. We get lucky, we work without scruples, we get rich.
What more can we want? Being greedy we first want more and more
money, but then, after a generation or two we control the financial
system and money has lost its glamour; but by now we see that money
gave us POWER. We now love power! We can dictate to governments,
we can choose who can be elected. By gifts to universities we can
have them favour what we want taught. By control of news and government
we can send nations to war so - where can we go, oh where can we
go, from here? *1
The world WE control is over-crowded and
polluted. Valuable resources (OUR resources) are wasted. It's OUR
world and we want it for OUR families. We spend a lot of (other-peoples
*2) money on pushing conservation
but that is not the answer because we cannot get the level of conservation
we desire and freedom to enjoy our world so long as present population
levels must be managed. We don't want a world for those we have
enslaved we want a world for ourselves. *3
Now your correspondent says: " they
kill and terrorise innocent people for oil monopoly and profit
Back to being ourselves now. Can we
imagine a group, even of mafia morality, who have access to infinite
supplies of money wanting to sell a resource valuable to the future
of their families, for worthless figures in a bank ledger? Well,
when someone tells me an incredible story, I say, "Well I can
ALMOST believe that! But I cannot say, even jokingly that I can
almost believe that people, who work with such dedication and skill
for generations, do it all just for gain they know is worthless.
If I am wrong please enlighten me.
If we are to survive this attack we just
have to stop believing in the myths that international "public
relations" and (secret services) spread. We need to see that
this war is for life, not money. So long as we believe Globalism
is only about profits we keep running in circles: we believe they
need us for their profit. We must face that we are not their profit
we are their liability.
Question: What two deceits have created our present dangerous
situation and most urgently need exposing?
- The philosophy taught, and incessantly reinforced throughout
our lives by every form of mass media so that we believe it beyond
challenge, is called "Humanism". This philosophy
is totally dependent for its credibility on the theory of "creation
by chance evolution". Though the chance creation theory
has no scientific base or sound logic to back its claims it succeeds
because it is promoted by mass media and taught at all levels
of education as though beyond question.
The scientific evidence relating to our creation and human development
supports creation by intelligence alone. The evidence for intelligent
creation is in the rational nature of the creation and the evident
fact that chance creates chaos. This is supported by information
given us in advance of our ability to understand or work things
out for ourselves. We can observe that there is, behind us and
our creation, an intelligent directive. *4
Humanism, despite its name, has nothing to do with human or humane!
Humanism supplies a morality to replace the natural moral nature
of human. Humanism is the deceit of manipulators! Do leaders of
Christian denominations not see there is no Christian choice other
than to actively expose the fraudulent science backing humanist
philosophy and planning? Jesus said "He who is not with me
is against me." Meaning that those who do not teach truth
teach lies! Whether they do this by design or by default is irrelevant.
- The second important lie promoted for defence of Globalism is
the belief that those who rule do so for money. That so many of
those who promote this belief know well that the Globalist enterprise
owns and controls the USA Federal Reserve and its attendant worldwide
banking system demonstrates the difficulty of so many when taught
convictions come face to face with facts. It is urgent that we
realise that a life lived in self-contradiction is just a prelude
to death but that, on the other hand, those who come late to work
for truth get the same pay (reward) as those who came early. See
Matthew 20: 12-16.
Bars on our prisons of mind melt when we see that the Emperor really
has no clothes at all.
*1. Note: For more information
on bank power see "Globalism-Brainwash"
chapter 4; "Who really governs".
*2. Note: Globalists like wasting
public money because they want to keep the people poor, preoccupied
and pointless in their activities and thinking.
*3. Note: For more on mind manipulation
chapter 3; "Bernays .." .
*4 Note: The evidence and logic
promoted to support 'chance creation' is self-contradicting
(see "Of Truth"
and Search for other evolution items on
site. Chance is destructive of order. What captures people is
not the logic of the theory but the force with which it is promoted.