Editorial #1 - May 10, 2003
Public Manipulation; Why TheMindWeb; Biological war; Reason for
Why is it that well-known people like Gore Vidal and unknown people
like me are allowed to say in public that we do not have democracy?
If this is a dictatorship why do those with power over police and
armies not put us away as do other dictatorships? Well we have enough
on site to explain that, not a lot of reading. Let's reassemble
We live in system called 'democracy' but this 'democracy' is culturally
controlled by the "humanist ideology" religion. This means
that the dictatorship is hidden behind beliefs that control basic
cultural attitudes. The true power is hidden behind the ideology
and a fake government is placed in front of the ideology for focus
of public attention.
The ideology acts as a religious faith seemingly unattached to
the government but allows the governing powers to manipulate the
morals and values of majority populations. When people are indoctrinated
into a culture with a false base then good can be made to look bad
and bad can be made to look good.
Primitive dictators control their people by force; force is primitive.
In a "modern" party democracy we are controlled by primitive
beliefs rather than primitive force so even if a well-known and
respected person says, "This is not democracy" we still
believe that, if what the dissident claims is true, then authorities
will react with force. If 'authorities' and mass media ignore the
challenge, then so do we.
On the other hand, if authorities want you to believe something;
for example: we have to go to war to protect ourselves against "weapons
of mass destruction", the public reaction is massively stimulated.
If the national leader just said this and mass media merely reported
it, then those who heard would ignore it. We have learned to take
notice only if the message is repeated ad-infinitum in every media
by dozens of people.
So you see why our 'authorities' now have no fear of dissidents
and can claim we have freedom of speech. Great democracy! Dissidents,
if their message is too revealing, are either not reported or reported
too little. Few see, remember or believe dissident claims because
most of us feel no need for the effort to reason for ourselves.
Dissident comment does not fit the pattern of values set by our
ideology - the forces we rely on to interpret our beliefs for us
are missing. We, the people, do not want our comfortable, caged
mindlessness, disturbed and our leaders use freedom of speech to
build new deceptions.
So if I want you to take notice of what I say I have to try to
give honest explanations for thinking people. 'Globalist authorities'
don't let me be hassled because they do not believe I can dent their
perfect defense; the defense of an ideology created mind-set defended
by public-relations-machine-fed-government and mass media. So long
as their indoctrinated servants do not betray them they can safely
ignore dissidents. It is only because these matters are so important
to the human future that I persist. We are given self motivation
(will) and we have been given intelligence, we do not have to be
TheMindWeb was started so as to offer enough public information
to convince thinking people about two basic underlying human essentials.
1. The right to know that life was created by an intelligence and:
2. The right to know that we could only continue to develop as human
beings if we chose to live within the freedom of a true democratic/republic
system of government.
I think that aim, in the main, is now completed.
This process has gone about as far as it can go without the help
of readers. Those readers who care little for the future of humanity
will close their eyes to the irrational nature of PR manipulator
arguments; they will ignore the wasting away of human freedom as
they ignore the duplicity of 'party political democracy'. These
will fear to leave animalist ways and fear an unknown future, they
will make no effort to challenge or discuss advance of our human
potential in open forum.
However there are others who will study the material evidence and
comment, or seek clarification, where needed. These will not be
afraid to face the unknown but will gladly challenge the unknown
to explore the wonders of the human potential. It is written that
we should not test our Creator to save us from wanton stupidity.
Biological warfare; SARS and AIDS. How can we know; what can
An earlier editorial suggested the SARS virus was a Chinese germ
warfare project that escaped by accident before it was sufficiently
tested. As it posed a danger to China ahead of others, this virus
had to be reported to the world in order to get world help with
its control. We should all note the different approach authorities
have taken to this as against other viruses. A deadly virus, without
known controls, frightens Globalists; these people do not like risks.
That SARS is a mutation of an animal virus was confirmed by mapping
of its genes. The same was also said of AIDS. It is very difficult
to prove by examination if such are natural mutations or are mutations
created deliberately by genetic engineering. It is not uncommon
for some diseases to transmit between species but is uncommon for
others to do so. What should be of interest to us are the differing
attitudes of 'authorities'.
The situation is similar to when archaeology finds a stone arrowhead.
It is easy to imagine that this could have been produced by chance
fracturing of rock * but in fact that is so unlikely that the artifact
is always assumed to be manmade. So with AIDS and SARS; it seems
safe to assume that they are genetically engineered modifications
to what were previously diseases exclusive to non-human animals.
These may be far more dangerous to mankind as they are outside medical
*Note: ability to imagine a chance progression of events convinced
the world of chance creation and the desire of escapism was what
enticed most to ignore mathematical fact.
Had this new disease been deliberately released we might expect
that, like AIDS (*1), it would have been released more widely and
substantial numbers of people exposed before it was noticed. The
WHO authorities, confident of their ability to protect themselves,
would not need to panic; they would have just done their usual 'headless
Of course we cannot expect the culprits to be open to the public
about responsibility but a reading of events indicates that this
is the kind of disease that Dr. Brock Chisholm (first director of
the WHO) warned the UN of in1946. I say "this" (meaning
genetically engineered modified) rather than reproductions of known
dangerous diseases such as anthrax that are easy to multiply in
the small laborites of (not highly industrialized) countries, or
even by well funded terrorists.
However information released at the time of the anthrax scare showed
effective spreading of known disease also benefits from help of
first class facilities and good organization. See The Crimson Crime
of arrogance" Chapter 11 (*2). Today it is probable that few
countries have first class facilities for germ warfare development
and probably only three countries, China, the USSR and the USA are
at, or near, cutting edge. Saying fear of biological weapons being
created is reason for the Iraq 'war' is frivolous.
A biological threat to the super-powers would need scientific and
industrial muscle; facilities that could not escape inspection especially
when combined with overhead "activity surveillance" (as
was Iraq). The finding, or claimed finding, of crude facilities
or some chemicals will not convince many that preventing massive
biological attack was the true reason for the Iraq 'war'. Clue:
"weapons of mass destruction" means nuclear.
Nuclear threat by Design!
Since the collapse of the old regime in the USSR there have been
persisting stories of sale of nuclear materials and/or nuclear weapons.
It seems very likely that this is what the 'political' panic is
about. Though terrorists cannot produce such weapons they may well
buy them. The nuclear bomb is the ideal terrorist weapon; instantaneous,
massive consequences, small, frightening and unknown numbers available.
Our 'blind mice' leaders create terror and hate in blundering violence!
Are they, in manipulated ignorance, being used to ensure that, within
a foreseeable future, major cities will be destroyed?
That would, or could be easily made to, mark the beginning of the
end for the commercial world! It would also explain why the Globalist
controlled UN is not charging our war leaders with war crimes as
a step to bringing about the same result. No doubt Globalists feel
they have time for a more secure program?
Could our leaders really be charged as war criminals?
The issue of combatant morality is under increasing challenge and
the UN could show 'our' side in a very bad light if Globalists did
not have a better "economic collapse" trigger set up.
The morality of this "unauthorized by the UN" war is not
helped by revelations that we used cluster bombs.
Many countries and probably most people believe cluster bombs are,
or should (along with landmines) be outlawed. These weapons are
as easily seen as anti-child as military weapons! Their use in war,
or in civilian areas by forces with overwhelming military superiority,
is not morally excusable. Most of us opposed the war even if, in
its conduct, most rally behind leaders. Do we who opposed this war
want responsibility for the massive destruction plus unnecessary
and continuing death? Guilt-feeling citizens could be easily returned
to condemning leaders?
The claim by some that the 'war' was for oil riches is surely dead!
Why would the Globalist financial Empire want to waste oil to make
money? The idea that the war was because Saddam switched his UN
money from American $ to Euro is only credible if we ignore both
that this danger would more likely be increased by the war, plus
the obvious "New World Order" plans of Globalism.
The USA economy is shaky and our leaders are submissive to Globalist
finance. The economy of the USA could collapse at a wave of the
Globalist hand if the world turned from the $ to the Euro. So there
is no logic in looking at world events from old-fashioned "national-benefit"
viewpoints. Though national leaders may be happy to be deluded that
they defend national or personal interests the evidence is clear
that Globalists set the program. Watch what is done not what is
So what are these monstrous events about? That is well covered
on site (*2).
SARS recovery, at present, is more likely the result of good health
than treatments directed to containing the virus. Prepare for lifestyle
change; check out your gardening skills. Continued editorial May
*1 See Aids and the World Government
*2 See our small books at "Fast Downloads"
In particular Globalism Brainwash and The Crimson Crime
Remember: For past editorials see "Retired
Service files: "Fast Downloads" download and print
out our small books for quick reference and portability. These downloads
have small revisions and are specially formatted for reduction and
economic bookmaking see "Bookmaking Instructions". A photocopy
service such as Xerox will download and create as few as five books
of any title for a reasonable price.