Editorial #1 - July 12, 2003
The self-sacrifice humanity now needs.
We cannot become fully human
or escape our enslavement to Humanist Ideology
unless we face the need to sacrifice error for truth. Our culture
cannot be changed until
we understand and expose that the 'chance creation' theory is a
designed as a base for an enslaving Ideology.
If we are not prepared to sacrifice belief in this false god then
earth life, as scriptures say, will end. All other protest is futile!
Our only effective power is to expose the emotion based humanist
philosophy and the evolution myth on which it rests. Here is new
evidence exposing the evolution myth.
In June 2003 was announced a new African find: Three, 160,000 year-old
human skulls of modern design. This find proved, again, that teachings
about 160,000 years of human evolution are myth. How often do the
childish explanations of evolutions have to be proven wrong before
we ask ourselves why we are so persistently taught that we must
believe the primitive and anti-scientific chance-evolution theory?
A South African Internet site offers a superior theory to explain
that upright stance of mankind that is said to have begun the evolution
of man. Here are selective quotes from: allafrica.com/stories/199901080127.html
Posted to the web January 8, 1999, Johannesburg. "Characteristics
that distinguish us from apes may have been forced on our ancestors
by the presence of water, writes Ruben.
If the proponents of a revolutionary theory of human origins are
correct, our ancestors abandoned the trees not for the savannah,
but for the water - and humans share more physical traits with dolphins
than with apes.
This means that the story of how our ancestors developed the characteristics
that distinguish us from the apes will have to change.
At the recent Dual 98 Congress on Palaeontology and Human Biology
For the past 27 years she has been
promoting an alternative hypothesis on human origins which was put
forward by scientist Alistair Hardy in 1960. Hardy noticed that
humans share certain physiological attributes with aquatic mammals
Hardy was advised by his academic mentors not to pursue the subject
for fear of damaging his career. In the savannah hypothesis palaeontology
already had a "good enough" story to explain bipedalism.
So again we see why some theories or new research get no publicity
and how Globalism protects its lies; the savanna was not formed
until long after ape-man is supposed to have stood up to start the
evolution of man! What will they do about the new discovery of 'modern'
skulls 160,000 years old? Will they suppress discussion and ignore
it or will they try to discredit it? It could be a hoax but will
we be told the truth, a month has already passed without challenge
or debate of the most important find of a century. Only those making
the find and doing the tests to date will know the answer to their
accuracy, going public is a good start but the follow-up looks like
a cover up.
Let's not pursue that now and also I'll not go into details here
of a more realistic evolutionist alternative now being offered.
You may find that worth looking up on the Internet. We know chance
evolution did not happen so why is this new theory of interest here?
It is of interest because the evidence on which the new theory
is based helps explain how the design for humanity was carried through
the ages to a time when the earth was ready to support mankind and
the human development. We see now that the intellectual brain was
a special design kept apart from the program creating the biological
mechanisms of basic animal designs.
More logical theories of evolution are not publicized for very
real reasons: if they were publicized then doubts might enter the
enslaved mind. Some might say, "Hey, if what we have been taught
for years is baseless then perhaps this new story is also a fiction.
Is there a conspiracy to deceive us?"
If evolution answered the creation problems then, as most animals
would be advantaged by a better brain, all would progress. So the
intellectual brain (the most complex design challenge for creation)
would be common rather than very special. But, since the first fish
swam or the first worm turned each creature has had only the functional
needs of its kind.
That is, excepting two; ourselves and those strange friends of
mankind: the only wild animals to befriend humans by their own choice
despite what we do to them. Why do the only two super-brains appear
friendly rather than competitive although a world apart in every
other way? Why do humans feel so comfortable with water? Do Dolphins
have a memory of our birth - a memory of babies who grew arms and
legs instead of fins and left the oceans to challenge the dominance
of land animals with only a superior brain to defend their vulnerable
Comparative average brain-weight: Chimps 0.75 lbs.: Dolphin 3.5
lbs.: Human 3.00 lbs. Though the brain weight of dolphins is higher
than that of humans this is accounted for by the commonly observed
fact that the part of brain that operates bodies, weighs accordingly.
"Think about it. The human brain has existed in its complexity
for a hundred thousand years [Now 160 thousand. Ed.] The dolphins
have had theirs for 10 million years. No, it is not the dolphins
- it is WE who have finally reached Primate status! All these facts
tell us that dolphins have a big brain and excellent cognitive abilities.
Stories, as well as scientific experiments, give us this knowledge."
"Why are humans so fascinated by these mysterious creatures?
The earliest signs of contact between humans and dolphins are the
drawings in Stone Age caves in Norway and in South Africa. Romans,
Polynesians and Americans write about the mysterious rescue of victims
of ship accidents.
"The ancient Greek culture was also very interested in
dolphins; poets described these marine mammals as smooth and gentle
creatures. Aristotle studied dolphins because he was a biologist
as well as a philosopher, and he thought that dolphins were interested
in getting closer to humans.
"An Australian tribe included the following in their version
of the creation of the earth: " ... (the dolphins) never forgot
that all these "two-legged" humans on land are their cousins.
And that's why nowadays the dolphins come to find their human relatives,
to play with them as they did in the days of the dreamtime."
You see the point? The stories of dolphin/mankind friendships are
wide ranging and endless, and extend into mythology. Again we see
evidence of a creation of life that included the human creation.
Dolphins carried our genetic load, that special brain, for over
10 million years until the earth was able to support our potential.
We stood upright in the water and only dolphins have the mental
capacity to remember. Do they remember and love us because they
were our surrogate parents?
Evolutionists claim we are related to apes because they think we
look more like apes than any other creature. How simplistic! Potatoes,
Tomatoes and Deadly Nightshades are all of the same family yet could
hardly be more different. Different or similar, physical form is
a comparatively simple genetic rearrangement and physical features
are largely irrelevant to family origins. We could not get our brain
from ape genes! If we had got our brain genes from apes then all
apes would now be species of mankind.
Will computer technology finally allow us to break the language
barrier between ourselves and dolphins? When research puts the same
effort into knowing dolphins that has been wasted trying to prove
the non-existent evolution connection between man and apes then
we may well uncover more about our past with one breakthrough than
has than has been uncovered by one hundred years of wasted effort.
From Oppian (approx 200 BC), a
So Dolphins teem, whom subject, Fish revere
And show the smiling Seas their Infant-Heir
All other Kinds, whom parent seas confine,
Dolphins excel, that Race is all Divine,
Dolphins were men (Tradition holds the tale)
Laborious swains bred on the Tucson Vale;
Transformed by Bacchus, and by Neptune loved,
They all the pleasures of the deep improved.
When new made fish the God's command obeyed,
Plunged in the Waves and untried Fins displayed,
No further charge relenting Bacchus wrought,
Nor have the dolphins all the men forgot,
The conscious Soul remains her former thought.
The above is ancient and translated more than once so we may consider
ourselves fortunate that the thread of thought remains visible.
I think we may renew the top line for clarity to:
'So dolphins multiply, a species fish revere'
Science also says that Dolphins were once land based, so Oppian
is correct in saying that Dolphins were transformed from land creatures
to sea creatures although it happened millions of years ago. Was
he also correct in that they much later bore the infant mankind?
The Dolphin is a mystery creature recognized over ages and Oppian
must have learned from either mythology or our Creator. Mythology
has so often been shown to have a factual base but the transformation
from land creature to sea creature was long before humans were around
to turn it into mythology. Our Creator tells Biblically, of our
creation but says nothing of our means of transmission to earth
Those who have read "Revelations" (and hopefully now
see that they have meaning) may recall the Great Angel that stood,
one foot on sea and one on land. This angel gave John a small scroll,
a warning of a writing that seemed sweet to mankind but would make
So was that angel the angel of Dolphins and Humanity, creatures
of life on sea and land? Can we see that the little story that tasted
so sweet to mankind was the humanist philosophy that has now made
us very sick indeed; in fact, if we are not already in the time
known as Armageddon, then we are poised on its border.
Also think about the "fall of man" can that now be
better understood? Did Dolphin man meet up with the ape man and
was there a seduction that introduced animal instincts into the
human intellect? Instincts that the intellectual human has to learn
to understand and must defeat?
Sir Fred Hoyle said something to this effect; 'When you are following
a wrong theory every step becomes laborious but when on the true
path things begin to fit easily into place.' With that thought I
P.S. The new, 2003 edition "Of Truth" should be on-line
within two weeks. This fully revised edition is about 30% longer
and a more finished production. More about that with the next editorial.
Remember: For past editorials see "Retired
Service files: "Fast Downloads" download and print
out our small books for quick reference and portability. These downloads
have small revisions and are specially formatted for reduction and
economic bookmaking see "Bookmaking Instructions". A photocopy
service such as Xerox will download and create as few as five books
of any title for a reasonable price.