Updated Essay presented by A Gourley.
Because of advancing science, technology and population, it is now
a matter of urgency that we, in the 21st century, take seriously
the need to remove our governments from the control of the international
banking fraternity. The future of life on earth is far too important
to be left in the hands of partisan politicians who allowed, into
our schools, such disasters of indoctrination as a system to reduce
the reading comprehension of students and the enforcement of ideological
How could such drastic changes have been honestly made to our education
without extensive public discussion, proof of benefit and national
consent? It could not happen except by force of a dictatorial control
of national governments. See " The Crimson Crime" Introduction
and Chapter 1, and chapters 3&4 of "Globalism Brainwash".
The bullying, arrogance and injustice of the United Nations, our
controlled party systems and 'world government' masters is creating
anger and injustice world-wide! As we see in current events, this
alone is likely to have disastrous consequences. However these are
just the tip of the iceberg of dangers accumulating around the ending
of the 20th century.
On this site many looming dangers are mentioned. As there is so
much evidence there is no need to repeat it here though it is necessary
to state clearly the reason for concern. No doubt many readers will
see that if an arrogant "master race" (masters of deceit)
achieve world government, then we, the "kept-in-ignorance sheep",
will be in great danger.
Survival requires we control our government
Try to imagine yourself in the position of the self-serving governing
class and see the world from their point of view. What we see is
that these 'god-egos' will have no use for the great majority of
world population or concern for its welfare. We cannot, in common
sense, close our eyes to this and must resist the heavy emotional
pressures to submit.
The Blind Freddies of the 20th century cannot imagine that there
is a world government force behind their party government. They
cannot imagine that globalism has set a 'politically correct' agenda
for thoughts and attitudes that are unrealistic, unjust and hate
producing; they certainly cannot imagine that this is part of a
deliberate undermining of human culture in the interests of plans
to take-over the earth. Least of all can they imagine looking critically
at the evidence and thinking a little for themselves.
When the military/scientific world is in the hands of a group of
self-interest families then they are in the same position as a family
living on an island and needing to produce for only their own needs.
If their island became over-run with sheep that the family has to
constantly herd and control, you can imagine that pretty soon junior
would be saying, "Daddy, why do we keep all these sheep? We
only need the wool, meat and milk of a few! The rest are damaging
our island, creating work and are just a nuisance!"
Do you not think that controlling families would soon find a way
to get rid of the 90% who behave foolishly and create a nuisance
because they have to be motivated by lies?
We have discussed war by use of "bacteria, viruses and toxins"
that are comparatively easy/cheap to produce. Many small nations
have potential to produce diseases and toxins of perhaps even greater
life-destroying power than nuclear bombs although they would be
unlikely to achieve this because they do not have the financial
or technological power for weapons refinement and delivery.
Globalists do not fear the efforts of dissident they create because
these have limited finance and industrial capacity. They encourage
terrorism as a way to create fears, confusion and self destruction
within a world population it sees as enemy - an enemy having the
numbers and intellectual capacity to end the Globalist domination
based on finance and deceit.
Confident of being able to evade or control limited outbreaks of
diseases (artificial or natural) Globalists find it convenient to
have us kill each other off?
Ways and means of getting rid of those made ignorant are established,
and "creating conflict" (entice your enemies to kill each
other) "divide and conquer" have always been smart ways
to success. Old saying "Those whom the gods would destroy
they first make mad." The behaviour of misinformed people
is, to the truthfully informed, mad. However, let's look at an issue
that Blind Freddie would never imagine relevant.
A TV program discussing ethical problems of "cloning",
not surprisingly, missed the point.
Discussion was centred around the (inferred) emotional effect on
cloned children as though this should be decided by popular opinion
without evidence of fact: (ideological attitude is that any effect
can be made, by public manipulation, to order). There was also discussion
about the (inferred) dangers of creating a "master race"
as though, in our world today, this is a matter for regulation that
could be enforced by public demand. No suggestion of considering
family need of cloning as against political abuse of cloning, or
of our community taking up responsibility for its own government
as a way of gaining public access to information and moral decision
Outlaw of human cloning, as a political or commercial tool, is essential,
but how can control be enforced if we, the people, do not control
government? How can we ever know what is going on in other parts
of the world or behind the scenes when mass media is owned by the
On the other hand, to ban cloning at a family level seems frivolous.
For this distinction not to be brought into the discussion hid the
true relations of the issue. Artificial Insemination (AI) and cloning
are different moral issues. When parents other than "natural"
family parents are involved then AI is immoral because it introduces
If some may have a parent they can never know then that is the result
of an immoral act. AI becomes immoral when it produces an immoral
result. What is immoral does not become moral because it becomes
legal, scientifically possible or socially acceptable.
One effect of AI is that people may unknowingly marry a close relation.
Inbreeding is known to be undesirable as it magnifies the seriousness
of genetic defects. Behaviour that creates ruined lives should be
avoided. The risk may be small but the cost of avoiding it is even
smaller - a simple moral choice.
To create children of unknown parentage is socially harmful. Immoral
is immoral because it is socially harmful. If we are discussing
ethics/morals of reproductive methods then we can only have it both
ways if we accept beliefs that have no moral base such as 'creation
by chance evolution. But that also eliminates valid ethics/morals
We saw this 'both ways' morality well demonstrated in the Iraq
'war'. If ambush or hiding behind women and children is unlawful/immoral
then indiscriminate killing of women, men and children while hiding
behind weapons that give safety from enemy response must also be
unlawful/immoral unless those who make the rules have no concept
of law/morals. Those responsible are those who give the orders not
the duty bound soldiers. What nation has history entitling leaders
to throw the first stone?
Does it not come back to the question of whether it is socially
acceptable for some people to indulge personal satisfaction/benefit
at the cost of other lives? Would not many soldiers have felt shame
as they killed thousands from positions of safety?
Victimless moral crime
There is no such thing as "victimless" moral crime! How
often do we hear complaint against the use of asbestos, atomic energy,
gambling, tobacco, pollution, drugs, street-crime, racial abuse,
etc.? But do these protestors stop to consider that the twisted
values and immoral choices they accept unthinkingly in their everyday
lives create these problems - that most of our problems are consequences
of acts excused by false beliefs?
A moral crime is a crime against humanity; life is the victim and
we are all involved! We have, over recent generations, been adopting
increasingly immoral life-styles based on humanist ideology. We
ignore the social results of irresponsible "politically correct"
obsessions. We pretend our beliefs do not matter because life is
meaningless while, at the same time, complaining that alternate
beliefs are ruining our lives.
Are the lives being ruined today by family breakdown, street crime,
drugs, shady business, youth suicide, political deceit, deformed
children, terrorism war, etc; the result of anything other than
twisted and escapist social attitudes? Are our problems an acceptable
price for selfish living?
When people behave in accord with a false creation belief their
own lives and the lives of family and friends are corrupted, but
they blame others and expect their community to pay for, or fix,
the damage. Is that rational justice or, more important, will it
Of course many people will be highly indignant at this suggestion
because they do not want to face that they are responsible for the
consequences of their actions or their careless acceptance of irresponsible
beliefs. We hate to face responsibility but we cannot, in the end,
deny that our selfishness, and the suffering we cause, is our individual
responsibility. We do not have to believe what we are taught just
because we like to think it frees us from our responsibilities.
Contempt for moral responsibility is increasing because of falsely
ideology! Law, mass media and governments are ever ready to approve
the ethically or morally dubious while pretending a high moral attitude.
Why? Do you imagine that there is no beneficiary?
The case for the clone
A clone (as compared to Artificial Insemination) gives a known ancestry,
a known viability and a known history. If it is wanted then we can
assume that it has a social value based on the life of its earlier
'identical twin'. If, in light of future experience, we find that
clones do not follow the expected pattern of identical twins, then
there would seem no point to cloning. Without evidence we only guess.
- A person, late in life, having important work unfinished, might
feel justified to pass this duty on to a clone who, as a genetic
copy, should appreciate it.
- There are legitimate scientific research reasons for making
Is it strange that a culture that claims to be science based and
despising emotional religion insists on making an emotional decision
AGAINST moral cloning and FOR scientifically immoral Artificial
Is my clone another me? The evidence of twins, even those raised
separately, is that they have so much in common that it seems likely
the hopes and ambitions of our clone would be compatible. Also its
physical problems are known and, even though one may not want to
eliminate these by genetic engineering (as may be possible) experience
would be there to guide the clone and reduce or eliminate problems.
A clone, assumed as a delayed twin, should benefit from the experiences
of the original.
Precautions against cloning abuse
There are, as is usual, options for abuse. All moral questions attached
to scientific advance should be left to the time when we have needed
scientific evidence; but we cannot believe what we are told until
we eliminate Globalist controlled governments.
The greatest danger is political misuse. A global government could
create genetically engineered clones for work, play or policing
and do this in secret. These would be physical and mental slaves
little better than human robots. The human working community would
No political or private organisation should be allowed to raise
or produce clones before electorates choose and elect their own
representatives to their own parliament because that is our only
defence against political abuse. Without control of government we
can never have knowledge or control of what government plans, allows
Other Clones our Greater Danger!
This brings us back to TV 'entertainment' and discussion groups.
If a TV studio audience and panel of 'experts' were replaced with
school children, then they could be expected to come up with very
similar opinions. Because ideology now rules education: "politically
correct opinions" are cloned for social engineering purposes
in education establishments world wide. This is a totally obnoxious
moral crime and quite disgusting abuse of political power yet every
Blind (and uncaring) Freddie, at the expense of future generations,
commonly and emotionally embraces it.
If we honestly desire improvements we have to base action on fact
and evidence of fact, not mindless (one guess is as good as another,
opinion). Or worse: blind acceptance of beliefs created to serve
arrogant, self-serving, "social engineering" human enslavement.
Body cloning may be of low importance as compared to warfare by
means of deadly viruses, toxins, bacteria, etc. These however are
themselves trivial dangers compared to ideological mind cloning
designed to create intellectual slavery. This is because only mind
deforming beliefs can cause humans to believe that they do good
when they do evil!
Biological weapons, can be more deadly than nuclear (how many people
have nuclear bombs killed? How many have died of AIDS? How many
will SARS kill?). Biological weapons are easier to create and to
manufacture. See "AIDS and the World Government plot"
on this site. Virus bombs could mark the end of humanity, but only
if we allow ourselves to remain bound in intellectual slavery.
The difference in social importance between debating political
events and debating social reform is similar to that of the ship's
captain debating the breakfast menu as the ship steams blind, at
full speed, through fog and icebergs. When we are brain-washed to
see our physical food as more important than our intellectual food
we are bound for disaster.
We now debate moral and ethical values created on a base of an ideologically
enforced "chance creation theory". This theory, despite
the claims of those promoting it, is not science based, it is just
an emotional idea without established scientific backing - a virtual
reality only of value in service to the 'I-am-god' authoritarians
who plot to own the earth.
Fortunately there is growing resistance to selfish, ignorance! Time-tested
community values tend to persist even when the brain is persuaded
to accept ideas in which those values have no logical existence.
All is not yet lost. Vast arrays of man-made problems confuse those
who refuse to make an effort to understand what is happening! Chaos
mounts! Our window of opportunity may close; it depends on the resistance
Points of cultural reality to remember
The public mind is being occupied with sport, pleasures, mindless
debating or argument about matters of which we are not truthfully
informed. We are not truthfully informed because we are sedated
to believe in a meaningless creation and do not care enough to honestly
check the evidence.
The United Nations had science-backed search teams in Iraq and
spy flights over for years! Were they not concerned to monitor sales
of significant substances? Globalists own the production facilities
creating these materials! Was the form of the war adopted to allow
substances and technology to escape to people ready to die for revenge?
Are we supposed to believe that this is the level of effort needed
just to ensure that one impoverished nation DOES NOT arm for biological
or chemical warfare on a scale to be a world threat? Can we believe
anything they say about what they find after the event when our
leaders are clearly open to charges of criminal abuse of power?
Iraq probably did have materials for biological experiment but
did they have technology for the weaponry that would make them dangerous?
This production would take many years and use would probably be
suicidal even then; use would need to be forced by threat. Where
are these materials now: probably with nations better able to use
them and with desperate people seeking revenge. Our safety has not
been improved - was it ever intended that it should be? One thing
is sure; there will be consequences for years ahead.
World fresh water is limited! Fertile soil disappears under roads
and houses! New oil is being found at a slower rate than being used!
Recent reports say world oil supplies, with unchanged use, will
last no more than forty years. Blind Freddie thinks prices will
drop and stabilise after the war: if prices drop it will be temporary.
Population is growing but no known effort has been made to estimate
a safe level of population. Blind Freddie believes the UN cares
about our future and cannot accept that information is kept from
us because plans are activated to reduce population.
Why do cities now have to install spy cameras and police patrols
to try to keep the peace? Why are children and crime already out
of control in many suburban and country towns? Why do so many children
have poor reading ability and poor comprehension of what they read?
Why are world problems multiplying when advances in knowledge and
technology could be solving them? Are we so blinded by government
P.R. experts that we cannot see the growing cultural disintegration?
Could all these contradictions exist unplanned?
We will never know the truth unless we intelligently control
Without electricity modern cities are crippled within a week, they
are then soon overcome by looting, murder and disease. Cultural
subversion has destroyed social discipline but as technology advances
culture relies more and more on delicate high speed co-ordination,
accurate communication and a truthfully informed moral humanity!
It is historic for cultures to become increasingly corrupt as they
mature. It is usual for collapse of social order to come quickly
and with warning signs ignored. This is usual because early human
cultures are based on primitive beliefs.
As beliefs become enlightened cultures achieve new heights. Today
we have the science to understand what is happening and why. Will
we leave it to a God we treat as a garbage collector there to clean
up our mess? Those who do this stand a very good chance of being
seen as part of the trash for our best authority warned us not to
put our Creator to the test. We are expected to use the talents
we are given! If we will not develop our intellectual abilities
we are no better than the cattle humanist ideology wants us to believe
If you have read through from the beginning, thank you. Will Blind
Freddie die under the mess of his ignorant convictions or be awakened
by the trauma of our times?